NWAQ wrote: A less touchy mode for selections of parameters as opposed to stuff like filters or other paramers which are more scale-like, selecting waveforms etc is a bit iffy sometimes with the rotaries. Maybe even being able to use the arrow keys to go through values on a selected parameter?
Push knob to incremnt/cycle through? Would seem to be easily do-able.
As for Kylie, I think they are much more likely to implement Dannii first then upgrade to Kylie if it seems popular...
Amanita wrote: NWAQ wrote: A less touchy mode for selections of parameters as opposed to stuff like filters or other paramers which are more scale-like, selecting waveforms etc is a bit iffy sometimes with the rotaries. Maybe even being able to use the arrow keys to go through values on a selected parameter?
Push knob to incremnt/cycle through? Would seem to be easily do-able.
As for Kylie, I think they are much more likely to implement Dannii first then upgrade to Kylie if it seems popular...
- reconfigurable order of filters: i'd love to be able to put a hipass before the ladder, for example.
- midi output: it would be great if even just the minikeys on the built in keyboard would send midi, so i could input notes on the monomachine the same way as i do on the A4. Also, it seems like the CV track could theoretically be used as a midi track without totally changing the OS structure.
- more effects: i'd like to use some of the effects from the Octatrack, like the compressor. it's a bit clunky if i'm running the A4 into the octatrack if i just want to compress my bassline, for example, without effecting the lead lines as well. having this built into the A4 would solve the problem.
darenager wrote: Sine wave (without using filter) then Wavefolder then
Wavefolder or triangle shaping is a must if possible, which judging by the triangle fix it is. Ill add frequency modulation, which possibly isnt (unless they can make the LFO's pitch tracking oscillators?).